Cultural Identity, Technological Experience, and Social Influence: An Integrated Model of Consumer Willingness to Pay in the Micro-Short Drama Market of Henan, China

Authors

  • Haotian Ma
  • Yining Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/rr6jjr74

Keywords:

Micro-short drama; Generation Z; Cultural identity; Technology Acceptance Model; Theory of Planned Behavior; Willingness to pay.

Abstract

This study examines the determinants of consumer willingness to pay for micro-short drama content in Henan Province, China. The micro-short drama market in Henan has grown rapidly, fueled by Generation Z’s interest in culturally resonant content and immersive digital experiences. However, content homogeneity and uneven engagement across demographic segments pose challenges. We integrate the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to develop a conceptual framework linking cultural identity, technological experience (with immersion as a mediator), and social influence to users’ purchase intentions. A survey of 1,104 micro-short drama consumers (aged 18–45) in Henan provides the data for analysis. Multiple regression results indicate that cultural identity is the strongest predictor of willingness to pay, followed by social influence and technological experience (all p < .05). A logistic regression reveals that high price sensitivity significantly lowers paid content adoption among rural users (odds ratio = 0.62, p < .01). No evidence of endogeneity is found, and subgroup analyses show notable urban–rural and generational differences in behavior. These findings underscore the importance of aligning content with local cultural narratives, leveraging peer influence, and carefully incorporating immersive technology. The study offers theoretical contributions by uniting TPB and TAM in a cultural context, and provides practical implications for content creators and policymakers – including strategies for content development, pricing, and digital inclusion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

[2] Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26(9), 1113–1127.

[3] Cheung, C. M., Chiu, P. Y., & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337–1343.

[4] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

[5] Gao, L., & Bai, X. (2014). A unified perspective on the factors influencing consumer acceptance of internet of things technology. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 26(2), 211-231.

[6] Zhang, Z., & Li, W. (2022). Customer Engagement Around Cultural and Creative Products: The Role of Social Identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.

[7] Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 752–780.

[8] Lobato, R. (2019). Netflix Nations: The Geography of Digital Distribution. New York: NYU Press.

[9] Twenge, J. M. (2017). The Costs of overprotecting the young-iGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy-and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood-and What That Means for the Rest of Us. Journal of Psychology, 1-13.

Downloads

Published

18-09-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ma, H., & Wang, Y. (2025). Cultural Identity, Technological Experience, and Social Influence: An Integrated Model of Consumer Willingness to Pay in the Micro-Short Drama Market of Henan, China. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(9), 8-20. https://doi.org/10.54691/rr6jjr74