The Limits of New Historicism: Marjorie Levinson’s Interpretation of “Tintern Abbey”

Jiaran  Yun

doi:10.54691/swbr7531

Authors

Jiaran Yun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/swbr7531

Keywords:

Literary Criticism, New Historicism, Picturesque, Marjorie Levinson.

Abstract

Within the field of New Historicism studies of British Romantic poetry, Marjorie Levinson’s interpretation of William Wordsworth’s “Tintern Abbey” holds a significant position. However, Levinson’s analysis exhibits a notable flaw: her utilization of Gilpin’s texts without adequately considering the ideological backdrop they carry. This oversight neglects the unique historical context of these materials, specifically the prevalent ideology of the “picturesque” and the related phenomenon of picturesque tourism in late 18th-century Britain. By delving into this omission, this paper aims to unveil the inherent paradoxes within the New Historicist methodology itself and further explores the “post-critique” strategies of New Historicism in literary analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Collini, Stefan, ed. Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1992.

[2] Day, Aidan. Romanticism. London: Routledge, 1996.

[3] De Man, Paul. Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1983.

[4] Ding, Hongwei. Concept and Tragedy: Wordsworth’s Post-Revolutionary Transformation. Peking UP, 2002. (In Chinese)

[5] Gilpin, William. An Essay on Prints. 1792. London: Printed for R. Blamire.

[6] ---. Observations on the River Wye: and Several Parts of South Wales, &c. Relative Chiefly to Picturesque Beauty; Made in the Summer of the Year 1770. 2nd ed. Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership, 2001.

[7] Levinson, Marjorie. Wordsworth’s Great Period Poems: Four Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986.

[8] Liu, Alan. “A Poem Should Be Equal To: / Not True.” Romanticism, History, Historicism: Essays on an Orthodoxy. Ed. Damian Walford Davies. New York: Routledge, 2009, pp. xiii-xiv.

[9] McGann, Jerome J. The Romantic Ideology. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1983.

[10] Mitchell, W. J. T., editor. Landscape and Power. Translated by Yang Li and Wan Xinqiong, Yilin Press, 2014. (In Chinese)

[11] Simpson, David. “Romanticism, Criticism and Theory.” The Cambridge Companion to British Romanticism. Ed. Stuart Curran. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993, pp. 1-2.

[12] Xiao, Sha. Evangelicalism and Darwinism: A Study of Social Ideologies in Victorian England. China Social Sciences Press, 2023. (In Chinese)

[13] Yuan, Xianjun. “The Meaning of Nature: An Interpretation of Wordsworth’s ‘Tintern Abbey’.” English and American Literary Studies, vol. 2, 2007, pp. 72–87. (In Chinese)

[14] Zhang, Xuchun. “Tintern Abbey Without Tintern Abbey: The New Historicist Paradigm in British Romanticism Studies.” Foreign Literatures, vol. 2, 2003, pp. 52–56. (In Chinese)

[15] Twentieth Century Critical Theories and English Romanticism Studies. Peking UP, 2021. (In Chinese)

[16] Zhang, Zhiyi. “Tintern Abbey—Absence of History and Nature.” Journal of School of Chinese Language and Culture Nanjing Normal University, vol. 1, 2007, pp. 100–106. (In Chinese)

[17] Zheng, Jieru. “Are Slums Really ‘Picturesque’? On the Aesthetics of Poverty in the Context of Victorian Urbanization.” Foreign Literatures, vol. 4, 2022, pp. 57–67. (In Chinese)