Cultural Confidence and Global Vision of Chinese New Era Literature: A Case Study of the Web Novel Lord of the Mysteries

Wang  Yu

doi:10.54691/wpdhyp13

Authors

Wang Yu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/wpdhyp13

Keywords:

Chinese literature, literary modernization, international vision, web literature,

Abstract

This paper examines the cultural confidence and global vision of Chinese new era literature through a case study of the Chinese web novel Lord of the Mysteries. While web literature inherently excels in dissemination, its potential to inform serious literature remains underexplored. Lord of the Mysteries exemplifies literary excellence through its meticulous historical contextualization, profound character development, and rigorous world-building. These elements collectively enable the novel to transcend cultural boundaries and resonate with a global audience. Consequently, this study suggests a dual transformation: web literature may increasingly prioritize literary depth, whereas serious literature could benefit from embracing accessibility. To bridge this divide, creators must balance artistic integrity with reader engagement, producing works that are both critically valuable and broadly appealing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Wang, D. M., & Hu, H. L. (2015). The formation pathways and structural morphology of modern Chinese literary tradition. Theoretical Construction,(05), 49-58. https://doi.org/ 10.19810/j. issn.1007-4767.2015.05.012

[2] Li, Z. (2023). Cross-cultural dynamics, translational mediation, and post-aesthetic paradigms: Chinese web literature as world literature in the digital age. World Literature Studies (世界文学研究), 15(3), 45-61.

[3] Appadurai, Arjun. Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Vol. 1. U of Minnesota Press, 1996.

[4] He, C. Z. (2018). Systemic barriers to the global dissemination of contemporary Chinese literature: A Western-centric perspective. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University (Social Sciences), (01), 54-61.Q. D. Zeng, Q. E. Li: Progress in Civil Engineering, Vol. 32 (2012) No. 9, p. 3077-3080.

[5] Venuti, Lawrence. The translator's invisibility: A history of translation. Routledge, 2017.

[6] Clayton, R., G. J. Jameson, and E. V. Manlapig. "The development and application of the Jameson cell." Minerals Engineering 4.7-11 (1991): 925-933.

[7] Lukács, Georg Szegedi, et al. Conversando com Lukács. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1969.

[8] Bourdieu: critical perspectives[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.

[9] Zhou, X. (2003). Revisiting literariness: A conceptual archaeology. Foreign Literature Studies, (5), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-5529.2003.05.0111

[10] Moore, Erin. The Old that is Strong Does Not Wither: Sub-creation as a Response to Modernity in the Works of Morris and Tolkien. Diss. Reed College, 2012.

[11] Adorno T W. Max Horkheimer[J]. Dialectic of Enlightenment, 1947, 44.12.Pugh A R. B/Z and S/Z[J]. International Fiction Review, 1975.

[12] Wang, Y. (2024). Epistemological foundations of Mao Zedong's Yan’an Talks on Literature and Art: A dialectical materialist perspective. Journal of Xinxiang University, 41(1), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-3326.2024.01.004

[13] Tetzlaff D. Divide and conquer: Popular culture and social control in late capitalism[J]. Media, Culture & Society, 1991, 13(1): 9-33.

[14] Moretti F. Conjectures on world literature[J]. New left review, 2000, 2(1): 54-68.

[15] Russian formalist criticism: Four essays[M]. U of Nebraska Press, 1965.

[16] Hao, S. C., & Jiang, Y. (2023). "Literature as a vehicle for Dao" (Wen yi zai dao): Cultural logic in the Chinese Communist Party's literary discourse. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) , (4), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.19836/j.cnki.37-1100/c.2023.04.002

[17] Bakhtin M M. The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy and learning[J]. 1981.

[18] Nelson H E, O'Connell A. Dementia: the estimation of premorbid intelligence levels using the New Adult Reading Test[J]. Cortex, 1978, 14(2): 234-244.

[19] Bentley J L. Multidimensional divide-and-conquer[J]. Communications of the ACM, 1980, 23(4): 214-229.

[20] Jenkins H. 3. Searching for the Origami Unicorn: The Matrix and Transmedia Storytelling [M]//Convergence culture. New York University Press, 2006: 93-130.

[21] McLuhan M. MARSHALL McCLUHAN[J]. 1964.