Study on the Action Path of Environmental Communication in Urban Residents' Residential Choice Under the Mediation of Policy Perception

Authors

  • Lin Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/5mex2r24

Keywords:

Environmental communication; policy perception; risk perception; urban residential choice; environmental amenities; environmental justice.

Abstract

This paper studies the effect of environmental communication on the choice of place for urban residents through policy perception. It will not provide new empirical data, but it will collect related studies on environmental media coverage, risk communication and residential location choices to build a conceptual action plan. First, this paper will introduce how agenda-setting and framing in environmental journalism affect public attention and risk perception; then, it will examine the connection between these perceptions and institutional trust and awareness of environmental and housing policies. Based on research into air pollution perception, information consumption behaviour and preferences for environmental amenities in cities, this paper puts forward that policy perception may moderate the relationship between environmental communication and residents' evaluations of neighbourhood quality, environmental justice and future risk. The new system thinks that the messages of environmental responsibility released by the government and local authorities will affect people's decisions to move. Therefore, in the Design of communication strategies and urban policies, we need to take a mediating path; we should not focus too much on the effect of media messages and recognise that they also shape people's perceptions of environmental quality and living conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Estes, J. S. R. (2005). Public opinion, the media and environmental policy: Agenda setting, framing and maintaining the status quo. Portland State University.

[2] Anderson, A. (2009). Media, politics and climate change: Towards a new research agenda. International Communication Gazette, 71(1–2), 3–18.

[3] Hansen, A., & Machin, D. (2013). Researching visual environmental communication. Environmental Communication, 7(2), 151–168.

[4] Huang, Q. (2018). How have environmental news and the documentary "Under the Dome" changed the knowledge system and risk perception of Beijing residents about air pollution? SAGE Open, 8(2), 1–13.

[5] Lorono, L. (2019). Public perception of air pollution and information consumption habits in Greater Manchester. Manchester Metropolitan University.

[6] Tu, X. (2015). Happiness and preferences for urban green spaces: A hybrid choice model of residential location. JRSS Seminar Series.

[7] Badland, H., & Duncan, M. (2009). Perceptions of air pollution and its health impacts in urban areas. Environment and Behaviour, 41(3), 388–400.

[8] Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Vedlitz, A., & Grover, H. (2008). Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perception of global climate change in the United States. Environment and Behaviour, 40(1), 72–95.

[9] Wu, X., & Lee, T. (2020). Exploring the dynamics in environmental discourse: Public opinion, media coverage and policymaking. Environmental Systems and Decisions, 40(1), 14–28.

[10] Lorono, L., & Badland, H. (2021). Air pollution risk perception, information sources and residential choices in an urban area. Journal of Risk Research, 24(5), 634–652.

[11] Brulle, R. J., & Pellow, D. N. (2006). Environmental justice: Human health and environmental disparities. Annual Review of Public Health, 27, 103–124.

Downloads

Published

19-10-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhang, L. (2026). Study on the Action Path of Environmental Communication in Urban Residents’ Residential Choice Under the Mediation of Policy Perception. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(10), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.54691/5mex2r24