A Jurisprudential Analysis of Compensation for Mental Distress under the Civil Code

Authors

  • Tao Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/vekb9f89

Keywords:

Civil Code; system of compensation for mental distress; tortious conduct; jurisprudential analysis.

Abstract

The system of compensation for mental distress established by the Civil Code substantially strengthens the protection of citizens' personality rights and interests. It constitutes an institutional innovation in the protection of non-pecuniary interests, responds to the diverse needs of social life, and provides an institutional foundation for remedies against mental harm. The system rests on abundant jurisprudential support: it protects personality rights, is guided by fundamental legal principles, and operates as a form of legal responsibility. It is therefore well suited to contemporary social development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Dong, C. (2005). A jurisprudential analysis of mental harm suffered by third parties. Journal of Yunnan Institute of Finance and Trade (Social Sciences Edition), (4), 122–123.

[2] Gong, W. (2010). A jurisprudential analysis of compensation for mental distress in tourism contracts. Theory and Reform, (1), 130–132.

[3] Guo, J. (2017). Should mental distress be compensated in criminal incidental civil litigation? A discussion based on China's first 'right to chastity' case. Social Sciences Trends, (11), 40–46.

[4] Guo, L. (2011). Research on compensation for mental distress suffered by traffic-accident victims [Master’s thesis]. South China University of Technology.

[5] Hong, G. (2024). The Civil Code's system of compensation for mental distress: A functionalist perspective. Chinese Journal of Law, 46(4), 94–112.

[6] Huang, A. (2005). On compensation for mental distress caused by breach of contract. Journal of Yibin University, (9), 56–59.

[7] Sun, G. (2004). A jurisprudential analysis of compensation for mental distress arising from rape. Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, (6), 16–17.

[8] Xu, Y. (2005). Discussion of several issues concerning compensation for motor-vehicle traffic-accident damage. Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), (3), 65–68.

[9] Ye, J. (2011). An interpretive framework for the system of compensation for mental distress. Jurist, (5), 87–98, 178.

[10] Zeng, S. (2015). A jurisprudential analysis of compensation for mental distress in tourism contracts. Legal System and Society, (24), 104–105.

Downloads

Published

16-09-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wang, T. (2026). A Jurisprudential Analysis of Compensation for Mental Distress under the Civil Code. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(9), 103-107. https://doi.org/10.54691/vekb9f89