Beyond Conventions: Alternative Logics of Campaign-Style Governance from the Perspective of Sovereign Decision-Making

Zhang  Zhou

doi:10.54691/jcvwdv45

Authors

Zhang Zhou

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/jcvwdv45

Keywords:

Campaign-style governance; State campaign; Sovereign decision-making; state of exception.

Abstract

Campaign-style governance, as a distinctive national governance mechanism in China, constitutes a pivotal research topic in the field of public administration. Current research, whose theoretical framework is rooted in the practices of the country’s transitional period, confronts challenges including ambiguous triggering factors and the tension between "transcendence" (breaking bureaucratic norms) and "normalization" (long-term effectiveness and institutionalization) amid deepening legal development. This paper introduces the theory of sovereign decision-making proposed by Carl Schmitt and Giorgio Agamben, arguing that campaign-style governance is essentially a national movement initiated by the sovereign to suspend laws and integrate the bureaucratic system under a state of exception(SOE). Its "normalization" essentially denotes a process wherein the state addresses institutional gaps via extraordinary measures, thereby converting the state of exception into a new norm—rather than a process of self-normalization or ritualization. This framework not only accounts for the survival logic of campaign-style governance in the era of advanced legalization but also offers a cross-institutional comparative theoretical perspective for understanding the "normalization of states of exception" in contemporary nations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception (K. Attell, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.

[2] Feng, S. Z. (2011). The formation and evolution of China's national movement: A holistic explanation based on the political system. Open Times, (1), 73–97.

[3] Guo, W. F. (2024). The state of nature, the state of exception, and the governance of modernity: Agamben's reinterpretation of the state of nature and its political philosophical implications. Jianghai Academic Journal, (6), 60–68.

[4] Jiang, Z. Y., & Feng, K. D. (2024). Policy adjustment under risks and challenges: A study based on the evolution of China's food safety regulatory system. Chinese Public Administration, 40(9), 100–109.

[5] Liu, J., & Xiong, C. (2015). Explaining policy flexibility: The relationship between departments and districts in campaign-style governance. Public Administration Review, 8(6), 88–112, 187.

[6] Ni, X., & Yuan, C. (2014). How did the campaign-style governance of local governments become "normalized"? — An analysis based on the "Clean Up Unregistered Goods" special campaign of the S City Market Supervision Bureau. Public Administration Review, 7(2).

[7] Peng, B., & Zhang, Z. Y. (2015). The transformation and logical evolution of national governance models—taking environmental sanitation improvement as an example. Zhejiang Social Sciences, (3), 27–37, 156–157.

[8] Schmitt, C. (1933). Staat, Bewegung, Volk: Die Dreigliederung der politischen Einheit. Hamburg.

[9] Schmitt, C. (2005). Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty (G. Schwab, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.

[10] Xiang, M. (2024). Campaign-style governance: A mobilization mechanism with Chinese characteristics. Governance Research, 40(3).

[11] Xiang, M., & Yu, J. X. (2024). Long-term effectiveness of campaign-style governance: How can short-term central tasks be embedded in long-term development strategies? Comparative Economic and Social Systems, (1), 127–137.

[12] Zhou, X. G. (2017). The institutional logic of China's national governance: An organizational study. Reading, (2).