On the principle of "mirror of evidence" and its role in determining the facts of a case

Xiangfan  Fan

doi:10.54691/3sys7929

Authors

Xiangfan Fan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/3sys7929

Keywords:

Mirror of Evidence principle, Fact-finding in a case, Evidence law, Judicial practice.

Abstract

This paper focuses on the "mirror of evidence" principle in the field of evidence law, deeply analyzing its connotation, theoretical basis, and characteristics. Through judicial practice cases, it elaborates on the important role of the "mirror of evidence" principle in improving the accuracy of fact-finding, constructing logical chains, and ensuring judicial fairness. The aim is to reveal the key significance of this principle in restoring the truth of cases in judicial activities, providing theoretical reference and practical guidance for a more scientific and reasonable determination of case facts in judicial practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Guo, P. (2025). Research on the criminal absentee trial system in China (Master’s thesis). Southwest Minzu University.

[2] Xu, X. J. (2015). Research on the legal regulation of false civil litigation in China (Master’s thesis). Lanzhou University.

[3] Yu, J. Y., Ke, D. Y., & Chen, C. (2005). Cases and theoretical studies on litigation evidence. Legal Press.

[4] Zhang, H. X. (2002). On the relationship between substantive justice and procedural justice in criminal litigation in China. Gansu Theory Journal.

[5] Huang, H. (2019). Research on legal rules of electronic evidence in criminal litigation (Master’s thesis). East China University of Political Science and Law.