Development and Application of a Research Methodology for Landscape Ecological Risks in Resource-Based Cities in Geomorphological Transition Zones: A Case Study of Luoyang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/tdh6a461Keywords:
Research methodology; landscape ecological risk; landform transition zone; resource-based city; Luoyang City; spatial coupling.Abstract
Addressing issues in the study of landscape ecological risks in resource-based cities within geomorphological transition zones—such as the lack of regional adaptability in traditional methods, imprecise characterization of spatial coupling mechanisms, and the absence of long-term dynamic analysis—this study takes Luoyang, a typical resource-based city located in the mountainous-hilly-plain transition zone of western Henan, as its research subject. A comprehensive research methodology system comprising “data preprocessing—application of core methods—mechanism analysis—results validation” is established. By comprehensively applying core methods such as land-use transition matrices, landscape pattern indices, region-adaptive landscape ecological risk indices, and bivariate spatial autocorrelation analysis, and integrating long-term time-series data with multi-source data fusion techniques, this study achieves a precise characterization of land-use evolution, landscape pattern dynamics, spatiotemporal differentiation of ecological risks, and their coupling mechanisms. The study demonstrates that the constructed methodological framework effectively accommodates the dual characteristics of complex topography and the transformation of resource-based cities, overcoming the limitations of traditional single-method approaches. The synergistic interaction of these methods not only ensures the scientific rigor and accuracy of the research findings but also highlights the distinctive features of regional studies. This framework can serve as a methodological reference and a paradigm for research on landscape ecological risks in similar topographic transition zones and resource-based cities.
Downloads
References
[1] Fu Bojie, Lü Yihe, Chen Lidong, et al. Principles and Applications of Landscape Ecology [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2019.
[2] Liu Jiyuan, Zhang Zengxiang, Xu Xinliang, et al. Spatial Patterns and Driving Mechanisms of Land Use Change in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(1): 3-14.
[3] Chen Peng, Li Juan, Wang Peng. Landscape Pattern-Based Ecological Risk Assessment of Watersheds: A Case Study of the Fen River Basin [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(12): 4025-4034.
[4] Wang Jiping, Li Xuemei, Zhang Lei. Spatio-temporal Evolution of Landscape Ecological Risks under Urbanization: A Case Study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration [J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(7): 1627-1638.
[5] Zhang Ying, Li Yong, Wang Peng. Land Use Changes and Ecological Risk Responses in the Western Henan Landform Transition Zone [J]. Advances in Geography, 2022, 41(5): 876-886.
[6] Walker B, Salt D. Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World [M]. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2012.
[7] Ulbricht D, Petermann J, Fritsch U. Landscape pattern changes in a post-mining area: A case study from Lusatia, Germany [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2013, 28(5): 897-912.
[8] Sonter L J, Watson J E M, Gordon A. Land-use change and ecosystem service provision in mining regions[J]. Nature Communications, 2017, 8(1): 1563.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






