Research on Implementation Challenges and Countermeasures for China's Sports Arbitration Mechanism in the Post-Olympic Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/8k7zvq65Keywords:
Post-Olympics, Sports Arbitration, Sports Law, Dispute Resolution.Abstract
Following the successful hosting of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics, China's sports industry has experienced rapid development, accompanied by continuous improvements in sports regulations. After the Winter Games concluded, the newly revised Sports Law introduced a dedicated chapter on sports arbitration, enabling the comprehensive implementation of the sports arbitration system. While the sports arbitration system provides a sound theoretical framework for resolving sports disputes, its practical application faces multiple challenges. These include ambiguities in defining the scope of accepted cases, insufficient independence of arbitration institutions, and poor coordination between sports arbitration and other sports dispute resolution mechanisms. There is an urgent need to clarify the scope of arbitration, enhance the independence of arbitration institutions, and optimize the linkage between sports arbitration and other mechanisms to provide solid legal support for the healthy development of China's sports industry.
Downloads
References
[1] H.G. Song: Research on the Contemporary Chinese Sports Normative System Based on Order Formation, Journal of Chengdu Sport University, Vol. 51 (2025) No.3, p.95.
[2] Information on http://tyj.zj.gov.cn/art/2025/4/2/art_1347212_59138115.html
[3]Y.Z. Xiong and Z.Y. Hu: China's Sports Arbitration System: Features and Improvement Strategies from a Comparative Legal View, China Sport Science, Vol. 45 (2025) No.7, p.93.
[4] S.W. Xu: Sports Disputes and the Construction of Legal settlement Mechanism(Law Press, China 2019), p.163.
[5] T. Zhu: On the Scope of Sports Arbitration Stipulated in the Newly Revised Sports Law, Tiyu Kexue, Vol. 42 (2022) No.9, p.6.
[6] H.T. Wu: On the Structure of Chinese Sports Arbitration System——Take the New Revision of the Sports Law as an opportunity, Journal of Anhui Sports Science, Vol. 44 (2023) No.6, p.8.
[7] Y.F. Zhai, H.M. Sheng and Y.M. Chen: The Justification Controversy over Mandatory Sports Arbitration Agreements and China's Response, Journal of Beijing Sport University, Vol. 46 (2023) No.12, p.49.
[8] J.H. Wang: Legal Standing of Sports Organizations and Coordination of Award Effect in Interface Between Sports Arbitration and Internal Dispute Resolution Mechanisms of Sports Organizations, Journal of Wuhan Sports University, Vol. 59 (2025) No.8, p.52.
[9] Y.P. Xiao and K.J. Zhu: On the Arbitration Solution of Sports Labor Concurrence Dispute, Sports & Science, Vol. 46 (2025) No.2, p.4.
[10] Y. Zhu: Autonomy and Efficiency: Autonomy and Efficiency: Research on Implementation Approach to System of Open Panel of Arbitrators-Also on Perfection of Panel of Arbitrators, Western Law Review, Vol. 2020 (2020) No.3, p.70.
[11] W.K. Xu: On the content characteristics and implementation prospect for the sports arbitration system in China, Journal of Physical Education, Vol. 30 (2023) No.6, p.25.
[12]S. Gao: Sports Disputes and Resolution Mechanism from the Perspective of Interest Conflict(Anhui Normal University Press, China 2016), p.72.
[13] L.Y. Huang: Construction of a Multiple Resolution Mechanism for Sports Disputes, Sport Science Research, Sport Science Research, Vol. 45 (2024) No.2, p.44.
[14] Z. Li: Establishment of Independent Sports Arbitration in China Under the Background of Amendment, Legal Science, Vol. 2022 (2022) No.2, p.172.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






