Research on the Attribution and Liability Path of Artificial Intelligence Entities Infringing on Legal Interests
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/wfky2c08Keywords:
Artificial intelligence entities that infringe upon legal interests, criminal liability, algorithm tracing, and multi-party collaborative governance.Abstract
The deep application of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has gradually permeated all aspects of social life, moving beyond a mere technological tool. The infringement of legal interests caused by AI entities is becoming increasingly prominent, posing a crucial issue for criminal law to address. This paper focuses on the attribution and liability for infringements of legal interests by AI entities. It defines the legal connotation of AI entities, distinguishes the legal attributes of weak and strong AI, categorizes the forms of infringement, and summarizes their core characteristics. Based on this, it analyzes the current challenges in criminal liability attribution, including disputes over the determination of the subject's qualifications, difficulties in determining causality, obstacles to the application of traditional attribution principles, and lagging criminal legislation. To address these issues, this paper proposes constructing a hierarchical and progressive system of responsible parties, clarifying the responsibilities of developers, users, and regulators; establishing a causal proof mechanism centered on algorithm tracing, and improving the rules for liability sharing in cases of multiple causes leading to a single effect; and constructing an internal governance path through optimized criminal legislation and improved judicial application, combined with the prioritization of civil liability and supplementary insurance and fund systems to build a multi-governance system. The aim is to provide theoretical reference and practical pathways for the criminal regulation of infringements of legal interests by AI entities, achieving a balance between the development of AI technology and the protection of criminal law.
Downloads
References
[1] Zhu Liangyu. The paradigm shift and liability boundary of criminal causation in crimes caused by artificial intelligence [J]. Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law, 2026, 41(02): 118-132.
[2] Xu Shengzhang. The identification of copyright infringement of artificial intelligence training data and its criminal regulation from the perspective of the intersection of criminal and civil law [C]// Beijing Criminology Research Association. Criminology Research (Vol. 4). School of Intellectual Property, Nanjing University of Science and Technology; 2025: 573-583.
[3] Chen Lu. Criminal liability allocation for damage caused by artificial intelligence under the theory of negligence and competition [J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 58(06):73-79+171.
[4] Li Chuan. The dilemma of criminal law regulation of personal information and the way out of attribution of responsibility under the background of generative artificial intelligence [J]. Journal of East China University of Political Science and Law, 2025, 28(06):22-34.
[5] Ma Yongqiang. Understanding the Perspective of Generative Artificial Intelligence Crimes and Criminal Law Responses [J]. Journal of the National Prosecutors College, 2025, 33(06):43-64.
[6] Zhang Yiran. Algorithmic infringement and criminal liability of personal information in the field of generative artificial intelligence —with “risk control” as the core [J]. Data Law, 2025, 8(01): 54-80.
[7] Wang Hongqiu. A Study on the Criminal Liability Subject Qualification of Strong Artificial Intelligence Entities [D]. Lanzhou University, 2025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






