Analysis of Evidence Transformation and Application in the Connection between Administrative Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/meqakr20Keywords:
Connection between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice; administrative evidence; criminal evidence; evidence transformation.Abstract
The connection between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice refers to a two-way operational system in which administrative organs and judicial organs work together to address administrative violations and criminal acts. Since its implementation, this framework has faced persistent theoretical disputes and practical difficulties concerning the qualifications for collecting administrative evidence, the rules for transforming and using such evidence, and the standards for its review. To address these challenges, it is necessary to further clarify, at a theoretical level, the power dynamics involved and the dual illegal nature of administrative crimes. At the level of legal implementation, improvements are required in several areas: the categorization and transformation of administrative evidence, evidence review procedures, rules for excluding illegally obtained evidence, the refinement of cross-departmental information sharing and feedback mechanisms, the advancement of legalization reforms in administrative law enforcement, and the promotion of the effective functioning of the connection between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice.
Downloads
References
[1]. Zhang Mingkai, Distinguishing Administrative Criminal Law.Social Sciences in China.1995(no. 3),p.94–117.
[2]. Jiang Guohua,Zhang Bin,The Connotation of Evidence and Lawful Evidence Collection—From the Perspective of Collecting Evidence in Administrative Penalties.Evidence Science.2016(no.6),p.645–655.
[3]. Sun Xiaochuan,The Essence of Judicial Power is Adjudication—Ten Differences Between Judicial Power and Administrative Power.Law Science.1998(no.8),p.34–36.
[4]. Zhang Mingkai,Distinguishing Administrative Criminal Law.Social Sciences in China.1995(no. 3),p.94–117.
[5]. Huang He,Comparative Study of Administrative Criminal Law.China Fangzheng Press,2001, p.92.
[6]. Zhang Zetao,Constructing a Prosecution Initiation Mode for Administrative Crimes with Preceding Administrative Violation Determination.China Legal Science.2021(no.5),p.124.
[7]. Pan Haina, Adhering to Systems Thinking to Enhance the Rigidity of the Connection between Administrative Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice. Procuratorial Daily.July 5.2022,sec.3.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






