Research on Copyright Infringement Issues in Generative Artificial Intelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/kpwtx055Keywords:
Generative artificial intelligence, Copyright protection, Infringement liability.Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) technology has achieved rapid development since the release of ChatGPT and Sora, with significant breakthroughs in domestically developed models. However, the copyright legal issues it raises are becoming increasingly prominent. This paper, based on the principles of GAI generation and the originality standard of works, argues that GAI training data meeting the " originality " standard possesses the attributes of copyrightable material. China's current Copyright Law and related legal norms are insufficient to address practical problems such as disputes over the copyright status of GAI training data, the inapplicability of moral rights, ambiguity of rights holders, and difficulties in pursuing infringement liability. Drawing on international legislative experience, this paper proposes that China should clarify the protectability of GAI training data by adding copyright exception clauses, attributing its copyright to users while appropriately restricting moral rights. Simultaneously, it should distinguish the duty of care and infringement liability of platform developers and users, constructing a copyright regulatory system that aligns with the development of GAI technology, achieving a balance between rights protection and innovation in the literary and artistic fields, and promoting the sustainable development of generative artificial intelligence.
Downloads
References
[1] Yang Jianwu, Luo Feiyan. Hierarchical and Classified Management: Content Risks and Legal Regulation of Generative Artificial Intelligence [J]. Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 25(06): 13-22.
[2] See the Beijing Internet Court Civil Judgment , (2023) Jing 0491 Min Chu No. 11279_Global
[3] See UNESCO's Guide to Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education and Research.
[4] Ma Yunan . Risks and Governance of Generative Artificial Intelligence—Taking ChatGPT as an Example [N]. Chinese Social Sciences Daily, 2024-05-15 (7).
[5] Yuan Cheng. A Study on the System of Reasonable Use of Authors' Moral Rights [D]. Central China Normal University, 2017.
[6] Articles 3 and 4 of the EU's Digital Single Market Copyright Directive specifically establish exceptions for text and data mining, explicitly stipulating that text and data mining for scientific research purposes can be conducted without the authorization of the rights holder.
[7] Gao Zejin . Pandora's Box: Sources, Uses and Governance of Artificial Intelligence Training Data — A Rooted Study for 100 AI Developers [ J]. Journalist, 2022(1): 86-96.
[8] ( See Naruto v. Slater (888 F. 3d 418). )
[9] Zhao Lixin, Liu Jiaying . Determination of tort liability for generative artificial intelligence behavior [J]. Journal of Hebei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 48(05): 147-156.
[10] Liu Cheng. Copyright Protection of Generative Artificial Intelligence Data Training and Its International Experience [J]. Chongqing Social Sciences, 2025, (07): 6-17.
[11] Wang Ruoyu , Hu Shensong . Data traceability dilemma and collaborative governance path for copyright determination of content based on generative artificial intelligence [J]. Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 25(06): 32-40.
[12] Wang Liming. Attribution Principles and Fault Determination in Generative Artificial Intelligence Torts [J]. China Law Review, 2025, (04): 15-30.
[13] Song Yunbo, Lu Yang . Dilemmas, Models and Legislative Improvement of Copyright Determination for Generative Artificial Intelligence Works [J]. Digital Economy and Rule of Law, 2024, (02): 49-67+243.
[14] Feng Xiaoqing, Guo Chang. Copyright Infringement Liability and Hierarchical Governance of Generative Artificial Intelligence Platforms — Reflections Based on the Hangzhou Ultraman Case [J]. Digital Rule of Law, 2025, (02): 56-75.
[15] Nie Hongtao , Chen Yifan. Copyright of Generative Artificial Intelligence Works: Ownership and Institutional Construction [J]. Hainan Finance, 2024, (03): 77-87.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






