The commercial transformation of urban cultural and artistic spaces in the process of gentrification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/886h1s20Keywords:
Gentlemanization, urban cultural and artistic space, commercial transformation, cultural authenticity, and spatial governance.Abstract
Against the backdrop of China's urbanization moving towards high-quality development, gentrification, as an important path of urban renewal, is driving the transformation of old industrial areas, historical districts, and other spaces that carry urban memories into cultural and artistic spaces that combine artistic attributes and consumer functions. Commercialization is precisely the core driving force supporting the implementation of this transformation. This article focuses on the driving logic, practical difficulties, and optimization paths of the commercialization transformation of cultural and artistic spaces in the process of gentrification through literature review and typical case analysis. Research has found that the "directional force" guided by policies, the "driving force" of capital inflows, and the "traction force" of middle-class consumption have jointly promoted transformation, but problems such as dilution of cultural authenticity and weakening of spatial publicness have also emerged in the process; The "micro renovation" of Yongqingfang in Guangzhou and the "resident participatory operation" of Xiaohezhi Street in Hangzhou provide feasible examples for balancing commercial value and cultural protection. The full text of the case studies and data are sourced from official government reports, academic research, and authoritative media public information, which are authentic and traceable, in order to provide practical references for the sustainable development of urban cultural spaces.
Downloads
References
[1] Morgner C. The morphogenesis of art districts: Case studies of Williamsburg, NYC and 798, Beijing[J]. Belgeo. Revue belge de géographie, 2014 (3).
[2] Wu F. State dominance in urban redevelopment: Beyond gentrification in urban China[J]. Urban Affairs Review, 2016, 52(5): 631-658.
[3] Nasser N. Planning for urban heritage places: reconciling conservation, tourism, and sustainable development[J]. Journal of planning literature, 2003, 17(4): 467-479.
[4] Wang M, Zhang F, Wu F. “Micro-regeneration”: Toward small-scale, heritage-oriented, and participatory redevelopment in China[J]. Journal of Urban Affairs, 2024, 46(10): 1953-1970.
[5] Wang J, Lau S S Y. Gentrification and Shanghai’s new middle-class: Another reflection on the cultural consumption thesis[J]. Cities, 2009, 26(2): 57-66.
[6] Su X. Urban entrepreneurialism and the commodification of heritage in China[J]. Urban Studies, 2015, 52(15): 2874-2889.
[7] Zhu Y, González Martínez P. Heritage, values and gentrification: the redevelopment of historic areas in China[J]. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2022, 28(4): 476-494.
[8] Xie J, Heath T. Heritage-led urban regeneration in China[M]. Routledge, 2017.
[9] Ye L, Peng X, Aniche L Q, et al. Urban renewal as policy innovation in China: From growth stimulation to sustainable development[J]. Public Administration and Development, 2021, 41(1): 23-33.
[10] Zielke P, Waibel M. Comparative urban governance of developing creative spaces in China[J]. Habitat international, 2014, 41: 99-107.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






