Difficulties and Countermeasures in Defining Criminal Subjects in Criminal Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/fx77e573Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence; Criminal Subject; Adaptability of criminal Law; Attribution System; Legal Innovation.Abstract
With the development of artificial intelligence constantly intervening in various aspects of social life, numerous legal issues arising from it urgently need to be resolved. Issues such as whether artificial intelligence has the qualification as a criminal subject in the field of criminal law have become increasingly controversial. The article reflects on the dilemma of artificial intelligence as a criminal subject, such as the lack of corresponding legal personality, uncertainty of subjective elements, and the lag of criminal law; Through typical examples such as autonomous driving, smart healthcare, and finance, demonstrate the shortcomings of current criminal law in terms of artificial intelligence accountability; Proposed the establishment of a responsibility system centered on "people", combining the absorption of legal agency ideas, exploration of innovative responsibility methods, and enrichment of pre-existing norms to form a diversified responsibility system. At the same time, it is necessary to establish legislative innovation and institutional improvement under artificial intelligence technology while adhering to the basic principles of criminal law.
Downloads
References
[1]Feng W . The Dilemmas and Solutions in the Application of Criminal Law to Property Crimes in the Age of Artificial Intelligence [J]. Economics, Law and Policy, 2024, 7 (2): DOI: 10.22158/ELP.V7N2P125.
[2]Shen Y . Research on Criminal Risks in the Age of Artificial Intelligence [J]. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Practice, 2024, 7 (2): DOI:10.23977/JAIP.2024.070208.
[3]I. A S . Problems of qualification of murder by perfect group methods (item "G" part 2 of article 105 of the Criminal Code) [J]. Yugra State University Bulletin, 2023, 19 (1): 23-28. DOI:10. 18822 /BYUSU20230123-28.
[4]Zhang D ,Li P . The Challenges and Response of Criminal Proceedings in the Era of Artificial Intelligence [J]. Management, 2022, 5 (3): DOI:HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.31058/J.MANA.2022.53004.
[5]Tarkhanov I ,Gayfutdinov R . The Subjective Scope of Crime and Its Signs in Criminal Law [J]. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2020, 162 (2): 161-176. DOI:10.26907/2541-7738.2020.2.161-176.
[6]Елена Анатольевна Пащенко. MORALITY AND CRIMINAL LAW CRIMINALIZATION OF THE ACTIONS OF THE SUBJECT CRIMINAL ASSISTANCE TO SUICIDE [J]. NORTH CAUCASUS LEGAL VESTNIK, 2019, 1 (4): 143-147. DOI:10.22394/2074-7306-2019-1-4-143-147.
[7]V. S E . SUBJECT OF BRIBERY UNDER THE MODERN CRIMINAL LAW OF RUSSIA [J]. Juridical Journal of Samara University, 2018, 4 (4): 159-159. DOI:10.18287/2542-047x-2018-4-4-159-165.
[8]CERNOMOREŢ S ,HORTOPAN M D . The analysis of the subjective side of the crime provided by Article 264 of the Republic of Moldova’s Criminal Code [J]. Relaţii Internaţionale Plus, 2017, 1 (11): 341-351.
[9]Malcher S D F ,Deluchey Y F J . Crime and Subjectivity: Reflections on the Discourses and Practices of Legitimizing Discriminatory Exercise of Criminal Law [J]. Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais, 2016, 2 (2): 99-116. DOI:10.26668/INDEXLAWJOURNALS/2526-0065/2016.V2I2.1458.
[10]Kuznetsova I N . The Subject of the Crime Provided by Article 2581 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation [J]. Vestnik Omskoj Ûridičeskoj Akademii, 2016, (32): 54-57. DOI:10. 19073/2306-1340-2016-3-54-57.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






