Research on the Motivation of Social Organizations Integrating into Community Governance Community Construction: Configuration Analysis Based on QCA

Wenting  Wei

doi:10.54691/g6ahb987

Authors

Wenting Wei

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/g6ahb987

Keywords:

Social organization; community governance; qualitative comparative analysis.

Abstract

The Ministry of Civil Affairs has launched the construction project of the National Community Governance and Service Innovation Experimental Zone. Each experimental zone focuses on the difficulties of community construction reform, strives to eliminate misconceptions and institutional barriers, and provides a number of practical and theoretical innovation achievements. The study selected 42 experimental areas as research subjects and applied Clear Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA) to explore the impact of six major factors on the effectiveness of social organizations' integration into community governance communities. Research has found that the construction of community governance communities is the result of a combination of multiple factors, and presents a diversified pattern. The necessary conditions for the integration of social organizations are professional competence and diverse cooperation, while the sufficient conditions are community support and financial subsidies. Through the data sorting and sorting of QCA software, the three combinations with the highest coverage rates were identified, namely social-driven type, multi-driven type, and official-driven type, which facilitate the integration of social organizations into the construction of community governance communities. Based on this, five effective paths for the integration of social organizations into the construction of community governance communities were summarized.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Li Xue.The Wave-Rider Stands at the Crest --A Review of the Development of Social Organization Management Work in the Past Ten Years[J].Chinese Civil Affairs,2022,(13):19-24.

[2] Cao Haijun,Xue Zhe.Analysis of the Three Stages of Government Procurement of Services from Social Forces under the "Three-Society Interaction" Mechanism[J].Chinese administrative management ,2018(08):41-46.

[3] SunLu.The Implications and Practice Logic of the "Four Society Interaction" Governance Mechanism[J].Guangxi Social Sciences,2021,(04):128-132.

[4] Yuan Ke,Zhao Jianling.The "five-community" joint action boosts the construction of a grassroots social governance community.[J].Henan Social Sciences,2022,30(04):75-82.

[5] Yao Jinzhong.Is "multi-community collaboration" appropriate for community governance? [J].Society and Public Welfare,2020,11(09):92-93.

[6] Wang Ke.Characteristics, Causes and Trends of Innovation in Urban Community Governance in China [J].Urban issues,2019,(03):67-76.

[7] Yin Guangwen.The Practice of Collaborative Governance by Multiple Actors in the Community Field - A Comparative Study Based on Four Typical Models of Community Governance Innovation [J].Journal of Yunnan Administration Institute,2016,18(05):125-130.

[8] Han Dongxue,Li Hao.Government-community cooperation promotes the construction of modern communities --- A case study of community governance and service innovation in Harbin City[J].Administrative Forum,2017,24(02):69-73+2.

[9] Du Yunzhou,Li Jiaxin,Liu Qiuchen et al.Configurational Theory and QCA Methods from a Complex Dynamic Perspective: Research Advances and Future Directions[J].Management World, 2021, 37(03):180-197+12-13.

[10] Turner R H, Human Behavior and Social Processes, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1962, 20-40.

[11] Biddle BJ, Role Theory: Exceptions, Identities, and Behaviors, New York: Academic Press, 1979.4.

[12] Wu Xiaolin.The Structure Remains Valid: Towards a "Structure-Process" Analytical Paradigm for Political Social Research[J].Research on political science,2017(02):96-108+128.

[13] Zhang Chi,Zheng Xiaojie,Wang Feng bin.The Application of Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Management Research: A Review and Prospects[J].Foreign Economics & Management, 2017, 39(04):68-83.

[14] Meng Fengping,Jiang Yang.Research on Key Influencing Factors of Agricultural SMEs' Crowdfunding Based on QCA[J].Huai River Forum ,2017(06):18-22+59.

[15] Wang Ming,Liu Guohan.Civil Society and Modernization of Governance[J].Open Era,2014,(06):12-25+5.

[16] Li Qingxia.Institutional Environment, Organizational Capacity, and the Effectiveness of Social Organizations' Participation in Social Governance: A Study Based on Qualitative Comparative[J]. Study forum ,2021,(01):91-98.

[17] Wu Jianguo.General Considerations on Improving the Economic Efficiency of Fiscal Subsidies[J]. Journal of Central Finance and Economics University,1986(06):69-72.

[18] Li Yunxin,Wu Zhiling.Research on the community support mechanism for the urbanization of agricultural transfer population[J].Rural economy,2016(03):111-116.

[19] Yan Hua,Wang Aijun.Structure-Function: Enhancing the Emergency Response Capabilities of Social Organizations and Pathways to Overcoming Challenges[J].Fujian Provincial Party School of the Communist Party of China（Fujian Administrative College ）Journal of Studies,2023(01):106-114.

[20] Fang Xuemei,Cao Jing.Study on the influencing factors of the outcomes of environmental collective protests - A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis[J].Research on risk disasters and crises,2020,(02):175-197.

[21] Ma Ben,Li Jipeng.Interpretation of the Not-In-My-Backyard (NIMBY) Effect in China: A Study Based on Qualitative Comparative[J].Journal of Shanghai Administrative College,2015,16(5):41-51.

[22] Du Yunzhou,Jia Liangding.Configurational Perspectives and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): A New Path in Management Research［J］.Management World,2017(6):155-167.