Nature and Specific Determination of Substituted Performance Agreements

Authors

  • Qianshuo Guo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/t1h0g976

Keywords:

Substituted performance; Consensual contract; Real contract; Novation.

Abstract

Article 27 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the General Provisions of Contracts in the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China, which came into effect in December 2023, explicitly stipulates the consensual nature of substituted performance agreements. To conduct a specific analysis of the underlying reasons for this stipulation, it is essential to proceed from the legislative purpose and the intrinsic nature of contracts themselves. Specifically, the parties to a substituted performance agreement do not stand in an unequal relationship with respect to the distribution of interests; therefore, such agreements should not be characterized as real contracts. Concerning the legal nature of substituted performance agreements, the theory of debt modification contracts should be adopted to preserve the identity of the original debt relationship. Furthermore, under the premise of acknowledging their consensual nature, it has become practically unnecessary to distinguish between substituted performance and novation in judicial practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Shi Shangkuan. General Theory of Obligations [M]. China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2000: 810-815.

[2] Huang Fen, Yu Xiaohan. Analysis of the Consensual Nature of Substituted Performance Agreements [J] . China Maritime Law Research, 2021, (1): 84.

[3] Zhu Qingyu. General Principles of Civil Law [M]. Peking University Press, 2016: 140.

[4] Wang Zejian. Principles of Obligations Law [M]. Peking University Press, 2013: 150.

[5] Liu Jia’an. An Inquiry into the Concept of "Real Contracts" [J]. Comparative Law Research. 2011, (4): 38.

[6] Ning Hongli. Gratuitous Contracts: Perspectives from Civil Law and Sociology [J]. Political Science and Law Forum, 2012, (1): 107.

[7] Wang Huasheng. On the Formation of Custody Contracts in China’s Civil Code [J]. Journal of Mudanjiang University, 2022, (1): 67.

[8] Liu Yong, Commentary on Article 679 of the Civil Code (Formation of Loan Contracts between Natural Persons) [J]. Jurists Review, 2022, (4): 175.

[9] Xie Hongfei. The Punitive Nature of Deposit Liability and Its Reasonable Control [J]. Law Science, 2023, (3): 89.

[10] Chen Ziqiang. Lectures on Civil Law II: Content and Extinction of Contracts [M]. Law Press, 2004: 333.

[11] Chen Ziqiang. Theory of Abstract Obligation Contracts [M]. China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2002: 323.

[12] Cui Jianyuan. Theory and Practice of Property-for-Debt [J]. Hebei Law Science, 2012(3): 26.

[13] Yan Zhi. Research on Legal Issues of Substituted Performance [J]. Contemporary Law Review, 2015, (1): 104.

[14] Huang Fen, Yu Xiaohan. Analysis of the Consensual Nature of Substituted Performance Agreements [J]. China Maritime Law Research, 2021, (1): 83.

[15] Chen Ziqiang. Theory of Abstract Obligation Contracts [M]. China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2002: 303.

[16] Chen Ziqiang. Theory of Abstract Obligation Contracts [M]. China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2002, p. 286.

[17] Wang Hongliang. General Theory of Obligations Law [M]. Peking University Press, 2016: 166.

[18] Fang Shaokun. On Novation [J]. Social Sciences in Guangdong, 2014(5): 254.

[19] Wang Qianwei. On Performance by Giving [J]. Chengchi Law Review, 2011(21): 35.

[20] Fang Shaokun. On Novation [J]. Social Sciences in Guangdong, 2014(5), p. 249.

[21] Fang Shaokun, Yan Cong. Legal Application and Nature Determination of Property-for-Debt Agreements[J]. Seeking Truth, 2018(5): 109.

[22] Chen Ziqiang. Theory of Abstract Obligation Contracts [M]. China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2002: 303.

Downloads

Published

20-01-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Guo, Q. (2026). Nature and Specific Determination of Substituted Performance Agreements. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 105-113. https://doi.org/10.54691/t1h0g976