On Administrative Procuratorial from the Perspective of Compliance

Authors

  • Fengfan Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/jt60kb48

Keywords:

Administrative Procuratorial Oversight; Corporate Compliance; Administrative Law Enforcement; Administrative Disputes.

Abstract

China's procuratorial power, which operates independently from administrative and judicial authorities, fulfills the legal oversight function. Within the framework of the corporate compliance system for enterprises involved in cases, the focus of administrative procuratorial work extends beyond legal supervision over administrative litigation. Instead, it increasingly emphasizes proactive oversight of administrative power, which is predominantly manifested in the process of administrative law enforcement. The core role of administrative procuratorial oversight in corporate compliance for implicated enterprises lies in supervising administrative law enforcement actions, facilitating the substantive resolution of administrative disputes, and effectively promoting the lawful and efficient implementation of the corporate compliance system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Li Fenfei. A Preliminary Study on the Criminal-Administrative Linkage of Corporate Compliance in Cases [J]. Political Science and Law, 2022, 40(01): 104-116.

[2] Li Hong. Compliance Programs and Corporate Criminal Responsibility [J]. Law Science Magazine, 2019, 40(09): 9-19.

[3] Huang Huiming, Gui Wanxian. The Functional Expansion of China's Procuratorial Power: From the Perspective of Constitutional Positioning and the Gap with Reality [J]. Journal of the Party School of the Central Committee of the C.P.C., 2013, 17(03): 106-109.

[4] Qin Qianhong, Chen Jiaxun. Building Procuratorial Supervision Suitable for Confronting Administrative Power [J]. Exploration, 2020, (06): 68-83.

[5] Information on: https://www.samr.gov.cn/xw/zj/202104/t20210410_327702.html

[6] Yang Zhikun. Research on the Linkage Mechanism between Administrative Procuratorial Work and Administrative Law Enforcement [J]. Jianghan Forum, 2022, (08): 123-130.

[7] Zhu Mengni. Three Models of Procuratorial Supervision over Administrative Power [J]. Social Scientist, 2022, (05): 124-131.

[8] Lin Yuejian, Liu Qingqing. A Law and Economics Restatement of Procuratorial Organs' Supervision over Administrative Law Enforcement [J]. Journal of National Prosecutors College, 2017, 25(05): 88-108+175.

[9] Jiang Guohua, Wang Lei. Institutional Analysis and Practical Improvement of Substantive Resolution of Administrative Disputes by Procuratorial Organs [J]. Journal of National Prosecutors College, 2022, 30(03): 96-110.

[10] Shen Fujun. An Analysis of the Function of Administrative Procuratorial Work in Resolving Administrative Disputes [J]. Politics and Law, 2022, (07): 163-176..

[11] Mei Yang. Conceptual Genealogy and Operational Mechanism of Procuratorial Supervision over Administrative Violations [J]. Social Sciences, 2024, (05): 171-180.

[12] Zhang Xiangjun, Ma Rui. Research on the Substantive Resolution of Administrative Disputes by Procuratorial Organs [J]. *Journal of National Prosecutors College*, 2022, 30(03): 75-95.

[13] Gao Tong. Digital Empowerment and the Operation of Procuratorial Power [J]. Journal of National Prosecutors College, 2025, 33(06): 120-135.

Downloads

Published

20-01-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yang, F. (2026). On Administrative Procuratorial from the Perspective of Compliance. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.54691/jt60kb48