The Application Dilemma and Countermeasures of the Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Electronic Evidence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/1ykhpz93Keywords:
Exclusion of illegal evidence, electronic evidence, exclusionary rule, exclusionary standard.Abstract
The exclusionary rule of illegal evidence is an important rule in criminal proceedings. Whether the exclusionary rule can be accurately mastered and applied directly affects not only the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, but also the final judicial justice. As an emerging type of evidence in the era of big data, electronic evidence is also one of the legally prescribed types of evidence and undoubtedly should be included in the scope of adjustment of the exclusionary rule for illegal evidence. However, on the whole, there are some problems in the current illegal electronic exclusion in our country, such as the imperfect legal provisions on the exclusion of illegal electronic evidence, the incomplete standards for the determination of illegal electronic evidence, and the insufficiency in the legality review of the electronic evidence collection procedures. Based on this, it is necessary to supplement and improve the relevant provisions in the Criminal Procedure Law, clarify the exclusion rules of illegal electronic evidence at the legal level, and refine the exclusion standards of illegal electronic evidence, so as to open up a way out for the application of the exclusion rules of illegal electronic evidence.
Downloads
References
[1] Yang Guanyu:Research on the Exclusion Rules of Illegal Evidence, Press of the People's Public Security University of China, (2002).
[2] Zhao Hanrui, Huang Xianshi, Li Xiaoyu:Research on the Authenticity of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Proceedings ,Journal of Shandong Police College,(2022)No.4,p.120-124.
[3] Yang Jun:On the Evidence Attributes and Norms of wechat Information,Journal of Huaibei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),(2018)No.1,p.24-29.
[4] Chen Ruchao,Reshaping the Mode of Electronic Evidence Review and Judgment: From Mixed Review to Separated Review,Hebei Law,(2022)No.7,p.46-72.
[5] Huang Zhenxian,Between Legality and Authenticity: On the Exclusionary Logic of China's Exclusionary Rules for Illegal Evidence ,Journal of Party and Government Cadres,(2021)No.2,p.50-57.
[6] Han Xu, Chen Yuexi,Empirical Analysis and Improvement Path of Exclusion Rules for Illegal Electronic Data,Evidence Science,(2024)No.4,p.468-483.
[7] Yang Hourui, Liu Yunhua,The Application Dilemma and Solution of the Exclusion Rules for Illegal Electronic Data,Western Academic Journal,(2024)No.7,p.79-82.
[8] Liu Pinxin,On the Exclusion of Illegal Electronic Evidence,Tsinghua Law,(2025)No.3,p.74-88.
[9] Long Siyu, Ye Yunjing,Exclusion of Illegal Evidence: The Contest between Authenticity and Legality,Journal of Yibin University,(2015)No.4,p.96-103.
[10] Wang Biao, Zhuang Yiming,Empirical Investigation on the Exclusion of Illegal Physical Evidence,Legal Application,(2022)No.2,p.68-79.
[11] Mu Jun The Predicament and Solution of the Generation Mode of the Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Evidence,Ideological Front,(2023)No.6,p.160-168.
[12] Hou Dongliang, You Yi,On the Improvement Path of the Exclusion Rule of Illegal Electronic Evidence,Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition),(2023)No. 5,p.475-480.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.