Research on the policy effect of the central bank giving priority to green bonds under the collateral framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/q0pk3774Keywords:
Green bonds, collateral policy, financial structured instruments, default risk, carbon tax coordination mechanism.Abstract
In order to promote the realization of the "dual carbon" strategic goals, the People's Bank of China has included green bonds in the medium-term lending facility (MLF) collateral framework and given it a priority status, marking a structural transformation of monetary policy tools in the green transformation. This paper focuses on the incentive mechanism and transmission path of this policy tool, analyzes the response behavior of commercial banks under the incentive of collateral policy and the constraint of default risk, and reveals the institutional advantages of green bonds in asset allocation and its risk boundary. On this basis, the synergy mechanism of green mortgage policy and carbon tax tools is further explored, and an optimization plan for the dual policy path of "incentive + constraint" is proposed. The study points out that while the green bond priority policy improves the efficiency of green capital investment, it needs to be combined with fiscal means to achieve a dynamic balance between policy effectiveness and financial stability. This paper has certain theoretical value and practical enlightenment for improving China's green financial system and enhancing the adaptability of policy tool combinations.
Downloads
References
[1] Mao Xiaoli, Xiang Hailing. Can “third-party certification” reduce the credit spread of Chinese corporate green bonds? [J]. Southern Finance, 2024, (06): 1-16.
[2] Liu Wei, Zhang Shushen. Research on the Dilemma and Countermeasures of High-Level Opening of China's Bond Market [J]. Macroeconomic Research, 2025, (02): 87-97.
[3] Chen Dandan , Shi Daimin, Qi Danyue, Shi Haoming. International comparison of green finance statistical standards and China's practice [J]. Statistical Research, 2024, (08): 1-13.
[4] Liu Xiaoxin, Wei Zikun, Sang Qiankun. Green finance and real economy: linkage mechanism, risks and China's strategies [J]. Economist, 2025, (02): 55-64.
[5] Zhuang Rulong , Lu Bangbang , Yu Xuejie, Yang Jie, Mi Kena. Green bonds and urban green transformation: characteristics, mechanisms and empirical evidence [J]. Environmental Pollution Control, 2024, (11): 1-18.
[6] Lan Hong, Zhang Xi. Institutional evolution of green bond standards: environment, subjects and market performance [J]. Guizhou Social Sciences, 2024, (12): 112-121.
[7] Yuan Haojun, Xu Li. International comparison and reference of innovative development of green bonds [J]. Fiscal Science, 2024, (11): 131-143.
[8] Wu Qingyong, Peng Liya, Yue Leilei. An empirical test of the impact of green bond issuance on corporate green innovation: empirical evidence from non-financial listed companies [J]. Statistics and Decision, 2024, 40(19): 156-161.
[9] Wu Hengguang , Lu Wenya, Gao Chunyan. Research on green premium of green bonds: a literature review [J]. Financial Research, 2024, (05): 57-67.
[10] Qi Yu, Zhou Rui, Xu Yankun. Constructing a synergistic mechanism between China's new carbon tax and carbon emission trading market [J]. Jianghuai Forum, 2024, (04): 97-105.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






