A Comparative Empirical Analysis of Climate Policy Leadership: China and the United States (1988-2024)

Ci Xuan

doi:10.54691/enpf4797

Authors

Ci Xuan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/enpf4797

Keywords:

Climate policy leadership, United States, China, policy innovation, comparative analysis, longitudinal study.

Abstract

This research compares climate policy leadership in China and the United States (1988-2024) by analyzing policy instruments across density, intensity, and consistency dimensions. The U.S. exhibits a cyclical pattern with high variability across four administrative-driven phases, while China shows a linear accelerating trajectory across three phases. U.S. patterns align with punctuated equilibrium theory, with presidential transitions explaining most policy variance. Chinese patterns reflect strategic adaptation, with policy shifts linked to domestic priorities and international positioning. Subnational action increases during U.S. federal disengagement, while Chinese innovation clusters regionally. Our findings challenge regime-performance associations, demonstrating that different political systems offer distinct advantages for climate governance, with implications for multilevel governance design.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Aldy, J., & Stavins, R. (2012). Using the market to address climate change: Insights from theory & experience. Daedalus, 141, 45-60.

[2] Andonova, L., Hale, T., & Roger, C. (2017). National policy and transnational governance of climate change: Substitutes or complements? International Studies Quarterly, 61, 253-268.

[3] Bausch, C., Görlach, B., & Mehling, M. (2016). Ambitious climate policy through centralization? Evidence from the European Union. Climate Policy, 17, S32-S50.

[4] Bernstein, S., Betsill, M., Hoffmann, M., & Paterson, M. (2010). A tale of two Copenhagens: Carbon markets and climate governance. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 39, 161-173.

[5] Bumpus, A., & Liverman, D. (2008). Accumulation by decarbonization and the governance of carbon offsets. Economic Geography, 84, 127-155.

[6] Byrne, J., Hughes, K., Rickerson, W., & Kurdgelashvili, L. (2007). American policy conflict in the greenhouse: Divergent trends in federal, regional, state, and local green energy and climate change policy. Energy Policy, 35, 4555-4573.

[7] Chan, S., Van Asselt, H., Hale, T., Abbott, K. W., Beisheim, M., Hoffmann, M., Guy, B., Höhne, N., Hsu, A., Pattberg, P., et al. (2015). Reinvigorating international climate policy: A comprehensive framework for effective nonstate action. Global Policy, 6, 466-473.

[8] Cole, D. H. (2015). Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy. Nature Climate Change, 5, 114-118.

[9] Di Gregorio, M., Fatorelli, L., Paavola, J., Locatelli, B., Pramova, E., Nurrochmat, D. R., May, P. H., Brockhaus, M., Sari, I. M., & Kusumadewi, S. D. (2019). Multi-level governance and power in climate change policy networks. Global Environmental Change, 54, 64-77.

[10] Ehnert, F., Kern, F., Borgström, S., Gorissen, L., Maschmeyer, S., & Egermann, M. (2018). Urban sustainability transitions in a context of multi-level governance: A comparison of four European states. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 101-116.

[11] Engel, K., & Orbach, B. (2008). Micro-motives for state and local climate change initiatives. Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2, 119-137.

[12] Frantzeskaki, N., Wittmayer, J., & Loorbach, D. (2014). The role of partnerships in 'realising' urban sustainability in Rotterdam's City Ports Area, The Netherlands. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 406-417.

[13] Harrison, K., & Sundstrom, L. M. (2007). The comparative politics of climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 7, 1-18.

[14] Hölscher, K., Frantzeskaki, N., McPhearson, T., & Loorbach, D. (2019). Tales of transforming cities: Transformative climate governance capacities in New York City, U.S. and Rotterdam, Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Management, 231, 843-857.

[15] Hsu, A., Höhne, N., Kuramochi, T., Roelfsema, M., Weinfurter, A., Xie, Y., Lütkehermöller, K., Chan, S., Corfee-Morlot, J., Drost, P., et al. (2019). A research roadmap for quantifying non-state and subnational climate mitigation action. Nature Climate Change, 9, 11-17.

[16] Hsu, J. Y. J., & Hasmath, R. (2017). A maturing civil society in China? The role of knowledge and professionalization in the development of NGOs. China Information, 31, 22-42.

[17] Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9, 7-23.

[18] Kern, K. (2019). Cities as leaders in EU multilevel climate governance: Embedded upscaling of local experiments in Europe. Environmental Politics, 28, 125-145.

[19] Keskitalo, E. C. H., Juhola, S., Baron, N., Fyhn, H., & Klein, J. (2016). Implementing local climate change adaptation and mitigation actions: The role of various policy instruments in a multi-level governance context. Climate, 4, 7.

[20] Kuramochi, T., Höhne, N., Sterl, S., Lütkehermöller, K., & Seghers, J. C. (2017). States, cities and businesses leading the way: A first look at decentralized climate commitments in the US. New Climate Institute: Cologne, Germany.

[21] Lange, P., Driessen, P. P. J., Sauer, A., Bornemann, B., & Burger, P. (2013). Governing towards sustainability—Conceptualizing modes of governance. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 15, 403-425.

[22] Lee, T., & Koski, C. (2015). Multilevel governance and urban climate change mitigation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33, 1501-1517.

[23] Li, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Energy and climate policy in China's twelfth five-year plan: A paradigm shift. Energy Policy, 41, 519-528.

[24] Liu, J. (2019). China's renewable energy law and policy: A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 99, 212-219.

[25] Liu, L., Wang, P., & Wu, T. (2017). The role of nongovernmental organizations in China's climate change governance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8.

[26] Liu, Y., Lu, Y., Hong, Z., Nian, V., & Loi, T. S. A. (2019). The "START" framework to evaluate national progress in green buildings and its application in cases of Singapore and China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 75, 67-78.

[27] Lo, K. (2015). How authoritarian is the environmental governance of China? Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 152-159.

[28] Lutsey, N., & Sperling, D. (2008). America's bottom-up climate change mitigation policy. Energy Policy, 36, 673-685.

[29] Marsden, G., & Groer, S. (2016). Do institutional structures matter? A comparative analysis of urban carbon management policies in the UK and Germany. Journal of Transport Geography, 51, 170-179.

[30] Moe, I. (2013). Setting the agenda. Chinese NGOs: Scope for action on climate change. Fridtjof Nansen Institute: Lysaker, Norway.

[31] Ostrom, E. (2009). A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5095, The World Bank: Washington, DC.

[32] Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analyzing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19, 354-365.

[33] Qi, Y., & Wu, T. (2013). The politics of climate change in China. WIREs Climate Change, 4, 301-313.

[34] Rogelj, J., Elzen, M. D., Höhne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H., Schaeffer, R., Sha, F., Riahi, K., & Meinshausen, M. (2016). Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2°C. Nature, 534, 631-639.

[35] Schreurs, M. A. (2008). From the bottom up: Local and subnational climate change politics. Journal of Environment & Development, 17, 343-355.

[36] Shen, W. (2017). Who drives China's renewable energy policies? Understanding the role of industrial corporations. Environmental Development, 21, 87-97.

[37] Stephens, J. C. (2009). Technology leader, policy laggard: CCS development for climate mitigation in the US political context. In J. Meadowcroft & O. Langhelle (Eds.), Caching the carbon: The politics and policy of carbon capture and storage. MPG Books Group: Cheltenham, UK.

[38] Tamazian, A., & Rao, B. B. (2010). Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Economics, 32, 137-145.

[39] Wang, C., Yang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2015). China's sectoral strategies in energy conservation and carbon mitigation. Climate Policy, 15, S60-S80.

[40] Wang, P., Liu, L., & Wu, T. (2017). A review of China's climate governance: State, market and civil society. Climate Policy, 18, 664-679.

[41] Wang, S., Zhou, D., Zhou, P., & Wang, Q. (2011). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China: A panel data analysis. Energy Policy, 39, 4870-4875.

[42] Young, O. R., Guttman, D., Qi, Y., Bachus, K., Belis, D., Cheng, H., Lin, A., Schreifels, J., Van Eynde, S., Wang, Y., et al. (2015). Institutionalized governance processes: Comparing environmental problem solving in China and the United States. Global Environmental Change, 31, 163-173.

[43] Zhang, Z. (2015). Carbon emissions trading in China: The evolution from pilots to a nationwide scheme. Climate Policy, 15, S104-S126.

[44] Zheng, S., Kahn, M. E., Sun, W., & Luo, D. (2014). Incentives for China's urban mayors to mitigate pollution externalities: The role of the central government and public environmentalism. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 47, 61-71.