Why does India still face challenges in addressing national development issues despite nearly seven decades of democratization?

Authors

  • Yifan Hu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/yadv0597

Keywords:

Indian democracy, governance challenges, economic liberalization, gender inequality, postcolonialism, institutional reform.

Abstract

India's seven-decade-long democratic journey has sustained political stability yet struggled to resolve persistent governance challenges, including economic disparities and gender inequality. This study employs a postcolonial framework and mixed-methods analysis to interrogate why democracy—despite enabling post-1991 market reforms and economic growth—fails to address systemic issues. Findings reveal that pre-reform stagnation stemmed from protectionist policies and bureaucratic inefficiencies, not democracy itself, while post-liberalization progress highlights the system's adaptability. However, entrenched gender discrimination, rooted in patriarchal norms and low female political representation, exposes democracy's inability to counter horizontal social oppression. Colonial legacies, socio-cultural fragmentation, and institutional inertia further constrain governance efficacy. The research concludes that India's democratic system operates within bounded limitations, requiring complementary reforms in economic inclusivity, social justice, and participatory governance to bridge the gap between procedural democracy and equitable development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Fukuyama, F. Political order and political decay: From the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy. Macmillan. (2014)

[2] Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. What makes democracies endure? J. Democracy, (1996) ,7, 39.

[3] Fukuyama, F. The origins of political order: From prehuman times to the French Revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. (2011)

[4] Sharp, G. From dictatorship to democracy: A conceptual framework for liberation. The New Press. (2012).

[5] Department of School Education and Literacy. Performance grading index (PGI) 2018-2019.

[6] Singh, H.V. Working Paper: Trade Policy Reform in India since 1991, Brookings. (2022)

[7] Liu, Y. India: Why doesn't democracy work? in Politics is the art of the possible. Guangxi, China: Guangxi Normal University Press, (2022),pp. 120–121.

[8] Word Bank (2023) World Bank Databank, Databank.

[9] World Health Organization (2023) Countries overview, World Health Organization.

[10] Patel, A. Nearly 50 per cent mps in New Lok Sabha have criminal records, India Today. (2019).

[11] Rawls, J. A theory of justice: Revised edition. Harvard university press. (2020).

[12] Stout, J. Democracy and tradition. Princeton University Press. (2003).

[13] Smith, A. The Wealth of Nations: An inquiry into the nature and causes of the Wealth of Nations. Harriman House Limited. (2010).

[14] Peet, R., & Hartwick, E. Theories of development: Contentions, arguments, alternatives. Guilford Publications. (2015)

[15] Sen, A. Development as freedom. Oxford Paperbacks. (2001).

[16] World Bank (2023) GDP growth (annual %) - India, World Bank Open Data.

[17] Hadenius, A. Democracy and development. Cambridge University Press. (1992)

[18] De Mesquita, B. B., & Smith, A. The dictator's handbook: why bad behavior is almost always good politics. Hachette UK. (2011).

[19] Fuller, G.E. The democracy trap: The perils of the post-Cold War World. New York, N.Y, U.S.A.: Dutton. (1991)

[20] Kraut, R. Aristotle: political philosophy. Oxford University Press on Demand. (2002)

[21] Huntington, S. P. The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century (Vol. 4). University of Oklahoma press. (1993).

[22] Easton, D. An approach to the analysis of political systems. World politics, 9(1957), 383-400.

[23] Ghardallou, Wafa, and Dorsaf Sridi. "Democracy and economic growth: A literature review." Journal of the knowledge economy 11, no. 3 (2020): 982-1002.

[24] Bhagwati, J. India in Transition: Freeing the Economy. Oxford University Press. (1993).

[25] Dreze, J., & Sen, A. India: Development and participation. Oxford University Press on Demand. (2002)

[26] Anderson, Perry. The Indian Ideology. Verso Books, 2021.

[27] The Economic Times (2011) India's annual average GDP growth at 6.6% in 1990-2010: Govt, The Economic Times.

[28] Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. "Weak, despotic, or inclusive? How state type emerges from state versus civil society competition." American Political Science Review 117, no. 2 (2023): 407-420.

[29] Ning, S. An analysis of Modi's economic reforms, China Institute of International Studies. (2021)

[30] Biswas, P.K. and Das, P. Indian economy: Reforms and development. Singapore: Springer Singapore. (2019).

[31] Parihar, S. Right to equality under the Indian Constitution, WritingLaw. (2022)

[32] Edwards, L. P. Gender, politics, and democracy: Women's suffrage in China. Stanford University Press. (2008).

[33] Beer, C. Democracy and gender equality. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44, (2009),212-227.

[34] Tan, R. and Wang, Z. On the exploration of India's political development path. Comparative Political Studies, 1(2018): 115-131.

[35] World Economic Forum (2020) Global Gender Gap Report 2020. [online]

[36] Batra, R., & Reio, T. G. Gender Inequality Issues in India. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 18(2006), 88–101.

[37] Bourdieu, P. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard university press. (1987).

[38] Loomba, A. Colonialism/postcolonialism. Routledge. (2002).

[39] Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. The Sage handbook of qualitative research Sage (2011).

[40] Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational researcher, vol. 33(2004), 14-26.

[41] UN Women (2023) Country fact sheet: UN Women Data Hub, Country Fact Sheet | UN Women Data Hub.

[42] Parekh, B. C. Colonialism, Tradition, and Reform: An Analysis of Gandhi's Political Discourse. Sage. (1999).

[43] Bose, S. C. (2012) The Indian Struggle. NSS Maniam.

[44] Joseph, M. An experiment with socialism finally ends, The New York Times. (2014).

[45] Transparency International (2023) 2022 corruption perceptions index: Explore the results, Transparency.org.

[46] Singh, S. Early middle class in India - quest journals. (2022).

[47] World Bank (2023) Population, total - India, World Bank Open Data.

[48] World Trade Organization (2023) India and the WTO.

[49] Anuja. India: 25 Years on, women's reservation bill still not a reality, Women News | Al Jazeera. (2021)

[50] Evans, J., Sahgal, N., Salazar, A. M., Starr, K. J., & Corichi, M. How Indians view gender roles in families and society. Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project. Pew Research Center, Accessed April 14, 2022.

[51] Fanon, F. Les damnés de la terre. A verba futuroruM. (2016).

[52] World Economic Forum (2022) Global Gender Gap Report 2022, World Economic Forum.

[53] Moshman, D. Adolescent psychological development: Rationality, morality, and identity. Psychology Press. (2005).

Downloads

Published

18-04-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hu, Y. (2025). Why does India still face challenges in addressing national development issues despite nearly seven decades of democratization?. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(4), 293-307. https://doi.org/10.54691/yadv0597