A Case Reflection on the Cross-Organizational Promotion Process of Professional Women in the Motherhood Penalty: From the Perspective of Actors and Their Rationality

Shimo  Zhou; Mintao  Jiang

doi:10.54691/b10y3h88

Authors

Shimo Zhou
Mintao Jiang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/b10y3h88

Keywords:

Professional women, motherhood penalty, cross-organizational promotion process.

Abstract

This paper examines the cross-organizational promotion process of professional women facing the motherhood penalty through the case analysis of Xiao Fang, a rural female teacher. Despite the dual pressures of family and career, Xiao Fang successfully overcame workplace gender bias and the motherhood penalty by establishing strong workplace networks and leveraging "discretionary space" for cross-organizational career development. From the perspective of actors and their rationality, the study analyzes how Xiao Fang used discourse and action to deal with conflicts with superiors and exclusion by colleagues, and how she achieved promotion within a professional institution that is legally compliant but implicitly punitive to motherhood. The findings provide insights into the challenges and coping strategies of professional women in the dilemma of motherhood.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Jinju Liu: How Large is the Motherhood Penalty in Urban China?, Population Research, Vol. 44 (2020) No.03, p.33-43.

[2] Jingyi Liao, Tao Zhou: Motherhood Penalty in Career Development, Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Vol. 49 (2020) No.01, p.139-154.

[3] Yadi Wang: Fertility Status, Care Support and Married Women's Wage, Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics, Vol. 41 (2022) No.02, p.91-101.

[4] Juhua Yang: “Double Penalty of Gender and Motherhood” and Female Labor Force Participation, Population Research, Vol. 43 (2019) No.01, p.36-51.

[5] Yundan Guo: Intellectual Women, Reproduction and Occupational Development: Study of 21 Women in Shanghai, Journal of Chinese Women's Studies, Vol. 18 (2009) No.02, p.26-31.

[6] Xin Tong: Care Work and the Gendered Labor Regime, Jiangsu Social Sciences, Vol. 37 (2017) No.03, p.43-54.

[7] Yanxia Zhang, Mavis Maclean: Rolling back of the State in Child Care? Evidence from Urban China, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 32 (2012) No.11, p.664-681.

[8] Suowei Xiao: "Yan Mu Ci Zu": The Intergenerational Collaboration and Conflicts in Childrearing among Urban Families in Contemporary China, Sociological Studies, Vol. 29 (2014) No.06, p.148-171+244-245.

[9] Meng Chen: Understanding Ideal Motherhood from the Perspective of UrbanMiddle-Class Mothers:A Case Study of Families in Shanghai, Journal of Chinese Women's Studies, Vol. 26 (2018) No.02, p.55-66.

[10] Ke Yang: Motherhood as Educational Agent:Changes in Motherhood in the Context of Market-Oriented Education, Journal of Chinese Women's Studies, Vol. 26 (2018) No.02, p.79-90.

[11] Buding, J. Michelle, Paula England: The Wage Penalty for Motherhood, American Sociological Review, Vol. 66 (2001) No.02, p.204-225.

[12] Correll, Shelley J. , Stephen Benard and In Paik: Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?, American Journal of Sociology, Vol.112 (2007) No.05, p.1297-1338.

[13] Yuxia Zhuang: Motherhood Penalty Theory and Its Explanation of Woman Job-Related Positions: Its Theory,Impact and Possible Strategies for Reducing It, Social Sciences International, Vol. 66 (2001) No.02, p.140-149.

[14] Yuxia Zhuang: The Effect of Fertility Events and Maternity Insurance on Female Employment of City and Town in China:An Empirical Study of CHNS Follow-up Survey, Population and Development, Vol. 26 (2020) No.06, p.87-98.

[15] Fan Yang, Yuchen He: Motherhood Penalty on Chinese Women in Labor Market, Population Research, Vol. 46 (2022) No.05, p.63-77.

[16] Correll, Shelley J. , Stephen Benard and In Paik: Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?, American Journal of Sociology, Vol.112 (2007) No.05, p.1297-1338.

[17] Anderson, Deborah J.，Melissa Binder and Kate Krause: The Motherhood Wage Penalty: Which Mothers Pay It and Why? The American Economic Review, Vol.92 (2002) No.02, p.354-358.

[18] England, Paula, Jonathan Bearak, Michelle J. Budig and Melissa J. Hodges: Do Highly Paid, Highly Skilled Women Experience the Largest Motherhood Penalty?, American Sociological Review, Vol.81(2016) No.06, p.1161-1189.

[19] Chao Shen, Widening Inequality: The Evolution of Motherhood Penalty in China(1989-2015), Chinese Journal of Sociology, Vol. 40 (2020) No.06, p.186-218.

[20] Fen Li: New Family Planning Policy and Career Development of Working Mothers, Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science) ,Vol. 17 (2015) No.04, p.12-20+146.

[21] Fang Yang, Xiaomin Guo: The Impact of the “Universal Two-Child Policy” on Career Women and Policy Support: A Perspective of Work-Family Balance, China Youth Study, Vol. 28 (2017) No.10, p.31-36+22.

[22] Rui Kang, Xuejing Lv: A Review of the Debate on the Relationship between the “Universal Two-Child Policy,” Fertility Intentions, and Women’s Employment, Theory Monthly, Vol. 31 (2016) No.12, p.155-161.

[23] Hui Yang, Li Bai: Canonical Correlation Analysis of 2nd Child Birth and Women's Employment in Urban China, Journal of China Women's University, Vol. 29 (2017) No.03, p.6-13.

[24] Jinju Liu: How Large is the Motherhood Penalty in Urban China?, Population Research, Vol. 44 (2020) No.03, p.33-43.

[25] Vanessa Gash: Sacrificing Their Careers for Their Families? An Analysis of the Penalty to Motherhood in Europe, Social Indicators Research, Vol. 93 (2009) No.03, p.569-586.

[26] Youyi Wang: The Key of Elimination of The Motherhood Penalty:To Eliminate the Carer Penalty, Theory Monthly, Vol. 38 (2022) No.03, p.109-117.

[27] Zhuoyan Mao: Protecting Women's Rights Is the Key to the Effective Implementation of the Three-Child Policy, China Population News ,Vol. 44 (2021) No.12, p.54-55.

[28] Dominique Desjeux: Social Sciences (The Commercial Press, China 2015).

[29] Lei Wang: Practice Process of Motherhood Penalty and Reflection on the Logic of Its Role: An Investigation from the Perspective of French School of Organizational Sociology, Journal of Social Development, Vol. 10 (2023) No.02, p.180-246.

[30] Michel Crozier: The Bureaucratic Phenomenon (Shanghai People's Publishing House, China 2002), p.179-180+127+133.

[31] Erhard Friedberg: The Power and the Rule: Dynamics of Organized Action (Shanghai People's Publishing House, China 2005), p.2-3+154.

[32] Tiantian Yang: As a Field of Action: Power and Rules in Organizations —— A Review of Erhard Friedberg’s Power and Rules: Organizational Dynamics of Collective Action, Sociological Studies, Vol. 20 (2006) No.05, p.228-240.

[33] Tiantian Yang: From “Power” to “Culture”: Bureaucracy Under Dual Perspectives —— Notes on Reading Michel Crozier’s The Bureaucratic Phenomenon, Sociological Studies, Vol. 21 (2007) No.04, p.230-242.

[34] Jingdong Qu: Case Studies towards the Analysis of Total Social Construction, Chinese Journal of Sociology, Vol. 39 (2019) No.01, p.1-36.