Trans-cultural comparison of Death Philosophy in “Five Bells”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/qpgfw727Keywords:
Trans-cultural Comparison, “Five Bells”, Death Philosophy.Abstract
The essay compares European, Chinese and Australian cultures of death by the analysis of main characters’ attitudes toward death in an effort to explores Jones’s philosophical thoughts on it. From the aspect of thematology in comparative literature, along with philosophical bases and historical sources about death among different cultures, the findings are that Modern Western death philosophy favors Irrationalism; Chinese death philosophy origins from Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism; as for Australian culture on death, it belongs to Western death philosophy, but its colonial history exerts a profound influence on aboriginal views of death.
Downloads
References
[1] L. Jacobs. Gail Jones’s “Light Writing”: Memory and the Photo-graph. Journal of the Association for the Study of Australian Literature,Vol.5(2006), p.191-208.
[2] R. Dixon. Invitation to the Voyage: Reading Gail Jones’s “Five Bell”s.Journal of the Association for the Study of Australian Literature,Vol.12(2012), No.3, p.1-12.
[3] L.B. Wang. Australian poets and China. Foreign Literature, (2001)No.1, p.41-49.
[4] L.B. Wang. Postmodern “little narrative” in Gail Jones’s “Sorry”, Foreign Literature,(2018)No.3, p.124-160.
[5] C.J. Zhan. On the Narrative Ethics of Australian Reconciliation Novels: A Case Study of “Sorry”.New Perspectives on World Literature,(2022),No.2,p.149-159.
[6] C.C. Zhang. The Mobility of Identity: Home, Travel and Intercultural Fortda in Gail Jones’s “Sixty Lights”. Contemporary World Literature,(2021)No.2,p.144-150.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
						
            
        
            
            
                





  