The Logical Construction and Implementation Mechanism of Full-Chain Synergy in Science and Technology Talent Policy
A Qualitative Analysis Based on Qingyuan City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/gsb3z368Keywords:
Science and Technology Talent; Policy Synergy; Full-Chain; Attraction, Cultivation, Retention, and Utilization; Logical Construction; Qualitative Analysis; Qingyuan City.Abstract
Against the backdrop of the "Talent-Strong Nation" strategy, regional competition for talent is intensifying. However, local science and technology talent policies commonly suffer from "fragmentation" and "policy silos," which sever the intrinsic links between the four key stages of talent work—"attraction, cultivation, retention, and utilization"—leading to low policy efficacy. This paper focuses on the systematicness and integration of talent policy, taking Qingyuan City as a typical analytical field. Using qualitative research methods, it deeply analyzes the internal logic and practical dilemmas of "full-chain synergy" in science and technology talent policy. The study posits that full-chain synergy is a necessary requirement driven by four logics: the value logic of responding to the "holistic" needs of talent throughout their life cycle; the functional logic of ensuring the "emergent" realization of the policy system's functions; the objective logic of reducing "dual" transaction costs for both talent and market entities; and the governance logic of advancing the "holistic governance" paradigm shift. However, the case analysis of Qingyuan City reveals four practical dilemmas: cognitive barriers of "prioritizing attraction over cultivation, retention, and utilization"; structural barriers of overlapping and fragmented functions; instrumental misalignment between the policy chain and the industrial chain; and operational blockages in information and evaluation mechanisms. To address this, the paper proposes implementation pathways to construct full-chain synergy from a mechanism design perspective: First, constructing a synergistic governance architecture centered on unified rights and responsibilities to achieve holistic top-level design. Second, reshaping a closed-loop operational system based on process re-engineering to achieve seamless process management. Third, anchoring a precise linkage objective guided by industrial demand to achieve a high fit between policy and needs. Fourth, establishing a long-term evaluation orientation supported by systematic assessment to achieve systemic incentive-constraint alignment. This research aims to provide theoretical reference and practical insights for local governments seeking to optimize their talent policy systems and build high-level talent ecosystems.
Downloads
References
[1] He, J. Z., & Chu, X. (2022). Tizhi zhengti xing zhili shijiao xia difang zhengfu kua bumen xietong de shixian jizhi yanjiu—Yige G shi ‘yi wang tong guan’ gaige weili [A study on the realization mechanism of inter-departmental synergy in local government from the perspective of holistic governance: A case study of G City's 'One-Network Unified Management' reform]. E-Government, (11), 31-41.
[2] Sun, R., Ding, G., & Yao, Y. (2021). Rencai shengtai xitong xietong yanhua: Yige lilun kuangjia [Talent Ecosystem Synergistic Evolution: A Theoretical Framework]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, (10), 154-160.
[3] Wang, H. Y., & Miao, L. (2019). Zhongguo quyu rencai jingzheng: Tezheng, tiaozhan yu qushi [China's Regional Talent Competition: Characteristics, Challenges, and Trends]. Administrative Reform, (5), 26-32.
[4] Liu, X., & Li, Y. P. (2020). Weishenme “qiang” lai de rencai liu bu zhu?—Jiyu gongzuo qianru xing shijiao de fenxi [Why can't "snatched" talent be retained? —An analysis based on the perspective of work embeddedness]. Management World, 36(7), 143-157.
[5] Zhang, H. B., & Zhang, N. (2021). “Zhengti xing zhili” heyi youxiao? Yige wenxian pingshu [How is "Holistic Governance" effective? A literature review]. Public Administration Review, 14(3), 185-208.
[6] Yu, J. X., & Zheng, X. (2022). Zhengti xing zhili de Zhongguo tujing: Lilun, shijian yu weilai [The Chinese landscape of holistic governance: Theory, practice, and future]. Chinese Public Administration, (6), 6-16.
[7] Han, Z. M., & Fan, X. G. (2020). Jiaoyi chengben, yingshang huanjing yu gao zhiliang fazhan [Transaction Costs, Business Environment, and High-Quality Development]. Reform, (1), 69-79.
[8] General Office of the CPC Central Committee, & General Office of the State Council. (2021). Guanyu wanshan keji chengguo pingjia jizhi de zhidao yijian [Guiding Opinions on Improving the S&T Achievement Evaluation Mechanism].
[9] Mi, J. N., & Wang, C. X. (2023). Difang rencai zhengce xietong de “duandian” yu “dudian”—Jiyu G shi de tansuo xing anli yanjiu [The "breaking points" and "blocking points" of local talent policy synergy: An exploratory case study based on G City]. Public Management and Policy Review, (4), 118-132.
[10] Zeng, X. Q., & Jia, X. X. (2024). Xin zhi shengchan li fazhan de rencai zhicheng jizhi yanjiu [Research on the talent support mechanism for the development of new quality productive forces]. Economist, (3), 67-76.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






