Metaphor Research from the Perspective of Cognitive Linguistics: A Case Study of “Sea” in The Old Man and the Sea

Authors

  • Ruimeng Xu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/5j8rcp77

Keywords:

The Old Man and the Sea, sea metaphor, cognitive linguistics, literary function, reader reception.

Abstract

This study starts from the perspective of cognitive linguistics, focusing on the “sea” element in Hemingway’s classic work The Old Man and the Sea. By analyzing the description of the sea, this topic tries to reveal the metaphorical concepts such as kindness, cruelty and female power, which are symbolized by the sea. By using the methods of text analysis and the theory of conceptual metaphor, this paper explores the role of these metaphors in shaping the overall style of the work, such as creating the unique literary atmosphere and affecting the readers’ reading experience, which includes the emotional resonance and in-depth thinking these metaphors evoke. From the perspective of cognitive linguistics, this study enriches the understanding of Hemingway’s writing style and provides a new perspective for the integration of cognitive linguistics and literary studies. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1]Amos, A. (2024). Discussion of The older analyst at work: The old man and the sea?.The International journal of psycho-analysis. 105(4), 595-600.

[2]Chen, Q. (2024). A Study on the Construction of Ecological Consciousness in The Old Man and the Sea from the Perspective of Conceptual Metaphor. Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science. 8(6).

[3]Ching, H. S. L. (2024). Exploring crosslinguistic influence on learning particles in phrasalverbs through a cognitive linguistic approach.Cognitive Linguistic Studies. 11(2), 402-439.

[4]Ernest Hemingway. (1952). The Old Man and the Sea. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

[5]Ge, M &Mao, R &Cambria, E. (2025).Discovering the Cognitive Bias of Toxic Language Through Metaphorical Concept Mappings.Cognitive Computation. 17(1), 65-65.

[6]Kandilat, Y & Ernest, H &Hasanah, S, N. (2021). Metaphorical interpretation in hemingway's stories. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities. 11(10), 216-219.

[7]KÖVECSES, Z & RADDEN, G. (2009).Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view.Cognitive Linguistics (includes Cognitive Linguistic Bibliography). 9(1), 37-78.

[8]Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[9]Zlatev, J. (2024).Constraining Metaphor and Metonymy in Language and Depiction: A Cognitive Semiotics Approach.Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric. 69(1), 7-29.

[10]Fa Pengyu. A Study of Translator Subjectivity in the Chinese Translation of The Old Man and the Sea from the Perspective of Cognitive Linguistics Translation Theory Master’s thesis. (MS., Shaanxi Normal University, China, 2015)

[11]Liu Walu. The Language Style of The Old Man and the Sea from the Perspective of Cognitive Linguistics. Chinese Language Construction, 27, (2017) 26-27

[12]Lu Jing. The role of cognitive context in the process of metaphor comprehension. Journal of Changchun University, 20 (11), (2010) 45-46

[13]Ma Jun. Cognitive Linguistics Research on Imitation Language: Metonymy, Metaphor, and Constructivization. Journal of Shenyang University (Social Sciences Edition), 26 (06), (2024) 89-97

[14]Ma Pingping. A Review of the Study of Ocean Imagery in Chinese and British American Novels Before the 20th Century. Journal of Yangzhou University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 20 (04), (2016)110-115

[15]Zhang Songsong. Review and Classification of Contemporary Metaphor Theory Research. Foreign Languages and Literature, 30 (03), (2013)145-152+216

[16]Zhu Xiaolin. Analyze the linguistic features and symbolic meanings of The Old Man and the Sea. Young Writer, (30), (2024)171-173

Downloads

Published

16-10-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Xu, R. (2025). Metaphor Research from the Perspective of Cognitive Linguistics: A Case Study of “Sea” in The Old Man and the Sea. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(10), 92-101. https://doi.org/10.54691/5j8rcp77